“Long before we stuffed
knowledge into graphs and charts, we used older, and in some cases more
entertaining ways to remember things.
Grids, Lists and Classification is a nice way of organizing things. But it is not the way the world works; and it
is certainly not the way the brain works.” ~ Patrick Jane in “The Mentalist”
Predictive Analytics and Big Data are the buzz words making
the rounds today, as organizations – especially online organizations try to get
better at predicting customer tastes and preferences. The entire supply-chain then bends backwards
trying to fulfil the prophecy, and works overtime making and stocking the
shelves with what has been forecast. In
an earlier post, I had mentioned about the over-dependence on data – grids,
lists, charts and graphs – the elusive hunt for that pattern which reveals how
a whole host of people are thinking or what is influencing their purchase
decisions. No doubt, all of this is very
useful. Today, the ability to collect, collate and analyse data from so many
different sources has gotten better.
However, I suspect the ability to interpret this in a meaningful manner –
has somewhat diminished – decision makers are trying to replace the critical
element of personal knowledge, emanating from skills and experience with mechanically
interpreted data.
So, I am drawn into wondering how personal knowledge that
emanates from skill and experience can coexist with the interpretations and
conclusions that we draw from charts and graphs. Do they predict the same thing – or are they
too many variables for either of them to be reasonably accurate. More importantly, how can the two work
together to improve the ratio of successful predictions. Like the apocryphal story about the old
worker who charges $100 to fix a boiler by tapping it with a hammer (read that here)
where personal knowledge is shown as being extremely important, to the other
story about Wal-Mart placing diapers next to beer because sales patterns
revealed increase in sales (read it here) where
analytics is shown to be the hero – we are left wondering where the twain can
meet.
Personal knowledge – that intricate mix of learning,
practice, sharing and experiencing – is what goes into creating organizational
knowledge. The ability of the expert to
share that knowledge in a vivid and memorable manner enables the organization
to embed that knowledge – institutionalize it.
In a similar manner, when patterns emerge from the way the organization interacts
with its ecosystem, the ability to identify it, and make it available to the
expert to create another memorable story is what analytical tools should become
good at. A picture is worth a thousand
words – they say; with data visualization getting better by the day, it should
be possible to create memorable images that then become stories that get
embedded as part of organization’s knowledge.
Have you come across any graphs or charts that have helped
you change the way you work?
No comments:
Post a Comment